Monday, February 6, 2012

An ongoing journey (part two).

Before we continue.

Please note that this blog is the second in a series of ‘thinking out loud about the Church. Nothing that is written here is a ‘special revelation’ (if such a thing exists) on how to do Church universally or, more importantly, locally. This series of blogs reflect my questions and concerns about the effectiveness of the local church as I witness it in South Africa in particular.


Introduction:

The purpose of this article is to explore what the New Testament says concerning the form and function of the local church. To that end, no outside source will be referred to in any way. We will approach this subject as enquirers who only have the Bible, not historical opinion or bias, as their guide.

The place of meeting:

Just prior to the birth of the Church as recorded in Acts 2:1-4, the disciples gathered together in the upper room of a house somewhere in Jerusalem (Acts 1:13). The birth itself took place in the very public environment of the Temple courtyards, this is evident given the description of the immediate audience to their infilling by the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:5,6,14,41).

The fledgling Church soon had 3120 members drawn from the Jewish - proselyte and born -population of Jerusalem and those visiting from around the known world (Acts 2:5,9-11). Luke tells us that this group met daily to hear the apostles’ doctrine (i.e. that which they had been entrusted with by Jesus Himself – Matthew 28:19&20).

Consider the mammoth task of marshalling a single group of over 3000 people without an established leadership structure. Furthermore, given the Temple hierarchy’s attitude towards Christ, large ongoing meetings promoting Him as Messiah would not have been tolerated for too long. Therefore it would have been necessary to break up this group and have each sub-group meet in the various private houses of those who had come to repentance along with the original 120 (Acts 2:46).

Even when Saul (i.e. Paul) enters the account we find him raiding private homes as a means of ravaging the church (Acts 8:3a). In Acts 12:12 Peter arrives at a private house where the believers were gathered.

Acts 16:5 presents compelling evidence of the growth of the church taking place in private dwellings. The context makes it clear that individual believers were not being discussed here, but rather the corporate gathering of believers. The number of congregations was increasing daily this could only have been possible if the private homes of believers were being used.

The practise of new converts allowing their homes to be used as meeting places is borne out by the account of Lydia’s conversion and baptism (Acts 16:15,34).

In Thessalonica, Greece, the church met, at some risk it would appear, in the house of Jason (Acts 17:5) who had opened his house to a group of converts from Paul’s meeting in the local synagogue (Acts 17:1-4).

While in Corinth Paul met Priscilla and Aquila (Acts 18:2,18) whom had taken the eloquent but untrained Apollos into their home, where the church met, for teaching (Acts 18:26; Romans 16:3-5a; I Corinthians 16:19). The city of Corinth had at least one other church group meeting in a private home, that of Titius Justus (Acts 18:7). This house was next door to the local synagogue where Paul was preaching the Gospel (Acts 18:4,8).

It would appear that a church met in the very house of Caesar (Philippians 4:22). Furthermore, it would appear that women were forthcoming with the use of their homes as the cases of Lydia (see above) and Nympha clearly indicate (Colossians 4:15).
The letter to Philemon reveals that the recipient of that letter also hosted the church within his private dwelling (Philemon 2). This letter also shows the expanded activities of the local church (vss. 7, 22).

The 'how' of meeting:

Again we approach only the Scriptures, this time to discover what should take place in our regular meetings together.

The first recorded meetings of the church (Acts 2:42-47) included: (1) Apostles’ teaching, i.e. Bible study/preaching (I Thessalonians 5:12; I Timothy 5:17; II Timothy 4:2; Hebrews 13:7), (2) Fellowship, i.e. partnership and participation (I Corinthians 14:20-33; I Timothy 4:13; I John 1:7) and social intercourse (including financial giving), (3) Breaking of Bread, i.e. communion (I Corinthians 10:16; 11:23-32), (4) Prayer = individual and corporate. It was for these reasons that the writer to the Hebrews discouraged absenteeism (Hebrews 10:19-25)

• These meetings were marked by a sense of awe and, quite separately, N.B. not the cause of the awe, signs and wonders were being done through the apostles (cf. II Corinthians 12:12).

• Those who were partaking in these meetings were delivered from the confines of ownership and made themselves and their possessions available to all by being prepared to liquidate assets to produce finance for those in need.
• The ongoing fruit of these activities was the salvation of new converts every day.

In the next blog we will continue to investigate the Biblical record for insight into the functioning of the New Testament Church in its local context.

Thursday, January 26, 2012

An ongoing journey.

Those of you who have read my blog in the past will know that I spent a lot of time attempting something approaching an allegory. The main thrust of that attempt was a journey through various ‘spiritual’ experiences and, I suppose, living parables. Whether I was successful in my quest is a discussion for another day.

Right now I want to share another journey with you. One that I have barely begun but have covered quite a bit of ground already. Just a quick piece of personal background. I have been in the so-called full-time ministry since December 1992. In that time I have pastored and fulfilled, hopefully, the role of a teacher (Bible teacher, that is, not those heroes and heroines who go to schools each day). I have studied at seminary and hold two degrees, one post-graduate. I lecture in college and travel quite a bit. I have written a few unpublished books which have proven helpful in one or two contexts.

Throughout this period, with growing intensity, I have felt somewhat concerned at how the average Christian group ‘does church’. Like many, as I am sure I am not alone, I have been concerned at the largely ineffective presence of churches in various communities where I have had the privilege to travel, work and minister. On the whole, and this is my personal opinion formed from my own observations, church is little more than a gathering of like-minded people to be entertained by musicians and singers of varying talents, or lack thereof, and then be spoken to, lectured, or preached at by what appears to be a specialist. Every now and again the doors to these gatherings open to release a minority of ‘insiders’ out into the world to reach out with whatever message is received behind those doors.

Please do not misunderstand me, many churches and Christian groupings around the world do marvelous work among the poor, and the disenfranchised. I honour them for their self-sacrifice and open-heartedness. But, do we really witness change on a Book of Acts level? I mean, do the young people of our city streets, for instance, really get attracted by the message they are hearing, or are they put off by the threat, intended or otherwise, of having to give things up, lose their friends, follow a particular set of rules pertaining to dress, music, and the like? Do suburban families who work hard and often with long hours really feel the need for what their local churches offer?

Why not start right there? What does the average local church offer? Now, you and I really need to be honest here, it will not be easy or palatable, but we must be courageous and face the facts head on. The average local church, of whatever ilk, has one primary activity: Meetings. More than likely the principle gathering will be a so-called Sunday morning service. This will comprise of some singing led by a ‘worship leader’, followed by an appeal for money, i.e. the offering, followed by the sermon, followed by some announcements concerning some more meetings. Is that really the best we can do?

You may argue that my description above is painted with a rather broad brush. That may be so, but is any Evangelical church, be it Charismatic, Pentecostal, hybrid, or otherwise really any different in its approach? Come on, be honest now. The format is pretty universal and, dare I say it, predictable.

At this point, please allow me to remind you that all of this is part of my journey. As such, I have many more questions than answers. What I am writing constitutes my questions; how I would love some answers.

Let me pose the principle question: Is church as we practice it in the western world (I have not traveled to the Middle East or Asia ... yet) really what Jesus had in mind when He spoke of “life more abundantly”? Okay, I can hear you. I know we are not supposed to just focus on the meetings as they only constitute a very small part of our lives. However, church is what the world equates with Christianity.

Where I find myself right now, I would say the following traits would more closely approximate God’s intentions: 1) Church should not be about tasking together, but about relating to each other, i.e. all who come regardless of need, belief, position, potential, etc. 2) Church should be a place where an environment is facilitated where people feel loved and secure. 3) Church is a tool to facilitate our lives together in relationship with each other and Jesus Christ.

After all is Christianity, first and foremost, God’s invitation for us to enter His reality? Now surely such cannot be ‘achieved’ with predictable formats, humanly led and dominated programmes which can only happen on certain days and times?

There is a place for group Bible study, no doubt about that. Corporate times of prayer, well there can be no debate there, can there? Times of rejoicing in song? Bring it on. However, each of these things are not an end in themselves, they are merely component parts of a greater whole.

That greater whole is the life I live beyond Sundays. The life with the not yet Christians with whom I work, study, play, and live. What I live out in that primary arena is what will attract, or put off, men and women towards the reality of a relationship with Jesus Christ. Please note, I did not say attract them to church.

Let me make my position clear on this point. I attend a gathering of Christians because I do have a relationship with Jesus Christ and I do like to be among people who love Him and are loved by Him (as everyone is). However, this getting together does not define my walk with God. Jesus Christ does.

I have a lot more to say on this subject but to go on would only put off those who have been mad enough to still be reading this far and I do not want to lose them as well.

So, let’s talk about this ...

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Sailing aboard the Pneuma (Part Thirteen)

The island’s harbour town was a bustle of activity, sounds, and smells. People were simply everywhere. So much so, it was almost disconcerting, what with all the pushing and shoving of the milling crowds. Although I had left the ship in a group I was now isolated in an ocean of bobbing heads.

I made for a fountain some fifty yards ahead of me. I had hoped it was mounted upon some steps and I would be able to recover the location of my friends from that elevated position. Living in such close proximity with a set group of people, over a period of time, makes one quite dependent upon their presence. I had not appreciated this fact before, but then, isolated as I then felt, it was an undeniable fact.

I was in for a double disappointment, no steps from which to gain elevation and no sign of any familiar faces. Lonely in the throng.

It was still only mid-morning and we were due to spend the night in that harbour. Therefore, there seemed no risk on pushing on inland for a bit of a look around. The dockside warehouses and the area directly next to them slowly morphed into terrace houses lined in long unbroken rows up and down either side of the street. Each house, though built the same way, was distinct in terms of different colour front doors, gardens – some lovingly tended, others neglected as if they had caused some offence.

Children played in and out of the front gardens. Screaming with glee as they ran, while others sat on their haunches spinning tops and playing marbles. Some of the boys, in various stages of dishevelment looked up as I passed and said things like, “hello mister”; the others simply ignored my presence. The girls seemed simply unaware of me or, if they noticed me at all, shied away.

It was only then that it struck me. The whole crowd down at the docks were adults pushing and shoving, shouting and cajoling, while everyone, in that street at least, were all children with not an adult in sight. I stopped and looked around and there was no evidence of any adults in the street, the only human movement came from children. This seemed like a place of strict separation, a demarcation based on what I did not know.

Puzzled but eager to move beyond the town limits, I passed from the presence of the children in to the open fields that bordered that side of the busy conurbation. As suddenly as the buildings ended and town smells faded, immediately the fragrances of the open fields caressed me. I was reminded of how important the natural created world was to my well-being. I felt almost relieved that I could no longer hear human chatter. Even the bubbling enthusiasm of the children was not missed. Now, for the first time in recent memory I was alone apart from the throng.

The blue sky was invaded by lace-like and the most see through of clouds. The grass beneath my feet was soft and lush as if well watered although there was no evidence of recent rain. The trees ahead of me seemed to beckon me closer excited to let me in on some secret. Birds weaved through the open air, their songs expressing a song of liberty of which most men could only dream. I caught sight of small animals in the bushes and evidence of bigger ones could be discerned in amongst the tall grasses and wild flowers.

For the first time since departing the ship, I thought of Shekinah. I felt immediately guilty that he had not been pondered upon at all. In fact, nothing that he had said had made it into my considerations or musings.

How could I be so neglectful? Was he not important in my life, had he not been such an influence for good? These accusing questions assailed me mercilessly. I felt compelled to stop walking and sit down to take time to consider him and what he had shown and taught me on this wondrous voyage.

My mind battled valiantly to get Shekinah into focus, to recall his voice, to mull over his wisdom. A bird swooping, a tree rustling, the sun reflecting of some small body of water, resisted every attempt. The sounds of the field and the woods seemed to mount a determined assault against all that was related to my gracious host.

Guilt welled up within me, as I could not gain for my mind the upper hand in the war. Thoughts of my not being worthy of even being aboard his ship mounted a vicious bombardment and I considered never returning to the Pneuma.

The feelings of ill will towards myself increased shutting out the beauty of my surroundings. The wonder of creation around me faded as images of dogs and old men with silk scarves elbowed and pushed their way to the centre of my attention. Accompanying them were reminders of bad habits and wilfully evil actions that had polluted my life both before and after boarding the Pneuma. I felt horrid, an outcast, one not worthy of all that being aboard that ship promised.

Suddenly, there stood before me a huge proud Stag. His antlers were a declaration of his strength and prowess. His eyes sparkled with a life that I had never seen in mortal men. His entire being seemed to vibrate with vitality and vigour. He bent his noble neck toward me until his face was only inches from mine. What happened next shook me to the very foundations of my being. Established science was overthrown, philosophy bamboozled, and religion firmly put aside. The stag spoke.