Friday, December 14, 2012

Knowing God is (Part Three Of Four)


The God who relates (I John 1:3).

It is the confession of the believer that through Christ we have come to know God who is Father, Son (Jesus Christ), and Holy Spirit. This expression of tri-unity manifests the relational nature of God. Relationship is at the very centre of who God is, a ‘oneness’ (unity) of three (Matthew 28:19; John 14:26, 15:26; II Corinthians 13:14; I Peter 1:2). The tri-unity of God then is a social ‘trinity’, the supernatural dance of the Divine.

While the aforementioned Scriptures clearly underpin the truth of the existence of God as triune, John 14:16-31 places the Three in a dramatic representation of triune relationship:

·         Vs. 16 – Conversation.
·         Vs. 18 – Orphan status for man does not gel with who God is.
·         Vs. 20 – In the Father, in each other.
·         Vs. 21 – Personal disclosure, the basic building block of relationship.
·         Vs. 23 – Sharing life together through abiding.
·         Vs. 28 – Going away from (temporary) and coming back to = The to-and-fro of relationship.

A God who is manifested through relationship within Himself, must, as a matter of nature, continue in relationship with that which He has created. In fact, the act of creation was an act of love. Love, in turn, demands the arena of relationship in order to express itself. So, God’s express desire as recorded in Genesis 1:26 sums up His intention as love (I John 4:8).

Therefore, the revelation we seek is the self-disclosure of God in relation.

In order to develop our understanding of the relational God whom we serve, it is necessary to clearly define two very important terms:

·    Transcendence – To go (be) beyond normal or physical human experience. To exist apart from and not subject to the limitations of the material universe (Ecclesiastes 5:2; Isaiah 6:1).

·     Immanence – Existing or operating within. With regard to God; to permanently pervade (i.e. to be present and active throughout) the universe (Acts 17:27&28; Job 34:14&15; Psalm 104:29&30; cf. Matthew 5:45, 6:25-30, 10:29&30).

This wondrous dichotomy represents an element of the awesomeness of God. Although he comes to us beyond the realm of the material (and the comprehensible), He enables Himself, by an act of His will, to enter into our experience of the material universe, thus making relationship possible  (cf. Genesis 3:8 [pre- ‘the fall’]; Hebrews 2:14-18, 4:14-16 [post-redemption]). However, He remains over it and self-sufficient from it, while remaining with us.

As physical beings, it is vital to understand just what the Bible means by describing God as spirit (John 4:24; cf. John 1:18; I Timothy 1:17, 6:15&16).

In the Old Testament the Hebrew word for spirit is ru’ach, meaning ‘breath’ or ‘wind’. A secondary meaning  is “the life principle in a human person.” [i]

This secondary meaning arose as the ancients recognized breathing as a normal sign of life. The Hebrews developed this idea by acknowledging God as the source of the ‘life principle’ (Genesis 2:7). This source of life principle brought about a third meaning for ru’arch: Spirit is the divine power which creates and sustains life.

In the New Testament the Koine Greek for spirit is: pneuma. Like its Old Testament counterpart this word reflects the interconnectedness of meanings. Pneuma also speaks of ‘breath’ and ‘wind’. Furthermore, it speaks of ‘life’ as well, and, it too, came to mean “the life creating power.” [ii]

These two words speak into God’s relationship to creation – He is the source and sustainer of all life, but, most significantly, human life.

This understanding of God as ‘spirit’ must also be understood within the dynamic of the tri-unity in terms of relationship. God then is dynamic movement (John 5:26). God is spirit = God is relational.

To only acknowledge God as ‘spirit’ would be to deprive the transcendent God of His immanence as a person. However, there is no Biblical text that explicitly states that God is ‘a person’. Having said that, the personhood of God naturally flows out of the Biblical witness as seen in the following examples of the attributes of personhood:

God is compassionate – Genesis 16:11; Psalm 78:38; James 5:11.
·        God is faithful – Deuteronomy 7:9; Psalm 36:5; I Corinthians 1:9.
·        God is gentle – Psalm 18:35; Isaiah 40:11, 42:3; II Corinthians 10:1.
·        God is longsuffering – Numbers 14:18; Psalm 78:38; II Peter 3:9.

It is not surprising then that the Holy Spirit inspired Paul to list the fruits of the Spirit required from the redeemed persons, i.e. the Church (Galatians 5:22&23).

19th Century German philosophy gave rise to a debate concerning Divine personhood. The argument against such personhood stated that to be a person always entails comparison. In other words, to be a person presumes a counterpart which in turn is limited and finite. God, therefore, cannot be a person as He is infinite. However, a counter argument corrects this error: To be a person does not mean to be limited to one’s counterpart, but to be related to such.

The personhood of God is further reinforced by considering the following manner in which He relates to this world:

·         He is incomprehensible: Personhood is ascribed to human beings because of this very thing. We never plumb the depths of the existence of our fellows.

·         He has a will: Human beings are persons because we witness each other exercising self-determination. All of us have goals, purposes, and plans. God is self-determining and He lies beyond our control.

·       He is free: True personhood is connected to freedom. Humans are persons because they act beyond the total control of others. As such we see God as totally beyond our control. Having said that, He is also the source of our freedom.

In Exodus 3:14 God calls Himself “I am”. In so doing “He demonstrates that His not an abstract, unknowable being or nameless force.” [iii]




[i] Grenz. Stanley J. Theology for the Community of God. Grand Rapids. Eerdmans. 2000. Pg. 82.
[ii] ibid. Pg. 83.
[iii] Erickson, Millard. Christian Theology. Grand Rapids. Baker. 2003. Pg. 295.

No comments:

Post a Comment